(no subject)
Nov. 5th, 2002 10:37 amFrom a polyamory mailing list:
> > Would you say that you are definitely open
> > to polyfidelity?
>
> I'm not. For me, polyfidelity is just like
> monogamy. Except with more people.
> > Would you say that you are definitely open
> > to polyfidelity?
>
> I'm not. For me, polyfidelity is just like
> monogamy. Except with more people.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-05 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-05 11:20 am (UTC)But then, not only do I have no problem with "monogamy with more people", I don't have massive problems with monogamy. I'm just currently in a poly relationship (two, in fact, until very recently). Monogamy is a fine thing if you care about having a single, strong primary more than you care about variety and the freedom to boff other chicks :-P
no subject
Date: 2002-11-05 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-11-05 11:20 am (UTC)On the one hand, I totally agree with the logical content of the statement.
On the other hand - it's tweaking my angst at the sfbay-poly community overwhelming feel of "being poly means out-looking-for-more-people-to-have-sex-with and if you disagree it's because you're being repressed or hypocritical and need to get over yourself" - which I disagree with.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-05 12:02 pm (UTC)Don't get me wrong, I think predator mode is a fine thing. Prowling for new partners, hey, whatever floats your boat.
But I think that attitude tends to focus on the NRE instead of simply building on what you currently have. There is a lot to be said for building on what you currently have instead of actively prowling.
Okay, off my soapbox and back to work. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2002-11-05 12:21 pm (UTC)So - I guess that puts me in a constant predator mode, but on a different vector.
the implementation is different for each of us. And for a bunch of people to whom "Your Kink is Okay" is a common model - why isn't this one? I'm often surprised at how not-the-mainstream-poly-model my model is.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-05 12:24 pm (UTC)Yup. It says a lot about the person who posted it (I'm never sure if I should name these people -- they are on a public mailing list, but still...).
I can definitely sympathize with the idea of being poly, finding a strong primary and just pretty much settling down with them. I've done that once for a couple of years. I can imagine doing the same with two or more people, though (as in the case with only one) it would have to be the right two or three people.
no subject
Date: 2002-11-05 12:22 pm (UTC)I find two common types of poly alot (which is not to say that there are only two!) - those in it to make and maybe maintain emotional relationships with others, and those who just want to chase new people.