(no subject)
May. 14th, 2005 10:58 amThis week, like most weeks, Robert X. Cringely has written a great article. This week's article is about upcoming changes in the video game market, the downloadable media market (think downloadable music and videos), and some pie-in-the-sky speculation about where Google could go next.
I figure Bob's hitting his usual accuracy of 60% to 70% - I have to agree with him on the first two, but I don't think that's the direction that Google's headed. He's right that there are some veeeery interesting options in that general direction, though...
I figure Bob's hitting his usual accuracy of 60% to 70% - I have to agree with him on the first two, but I don't think that's the direction that Google's headed. He's right that there are some veeeery interesting options in that general direction, though...
no subject
Date: 2005-05-15 09:06 am (UTC)In that light, the author appears to be confusing "offloading processing from your computer to google" with "ammortizing costs of traffic to slow servers".
His comments on Apple and Microsoft do seem a bit less off-the-mark.
Perhaps it is a good time to be in graphics/multimedia.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-15 08:09 pm (UTC)Most of the effort on the client is spent in rendering content to screen, and while Google could conceivably accelerate that in a couple of ways, I don't think they're doing so.
Incidentally - Google *is* offloading some processing from the client, conceptually, which the client is not yet doing for itself. Specifically, Google is analyzing the sent web pages to figure out where the client is most likely to go next (what pages it will mostly likely next request), which a good web browser should do for you, but none (that I know of) do.
Granted, it's probably analyzing the web pages in a really simple way and a good proxy server might do the same thing, but still.