noahgibbs: Me and my teddy bear at Karaoke after a day of RubyKaigi in HIroshima in 2017 (more of a hypothesis really)
noahgibbs ([personal profile] noahgibbs) wrote2010-06-01 08:54 am

A Request to Women Working in Tech

A friend recently said something about which, as Shanna's father, I feel conflicted.

She said that as a woman working in technology, she wouldn't recommend that other women enter the field. She's a system administrator. So, while she's not a computer programmer like myself, she's in a very similar field with mostly similar interpersonal dynamics. That is to say, what she says almost certainly applies to my field if it applies to hers. And as an actual woman working in technology, her experience is going to be significantly more accurate than my from-the-outside impressions.

I'm not going to repeat her reasons here. Rather, I'd be very curious whether other women working in technical fields, especially system administration and/or programming, felt the same way. Anybody care to comment? When you comment, please let me know what you do/did in technology. For some of you, I'll know offhand. For many of you, I'll have forgotten. For anybody who comments, there may be other readers who don't know/remember.

Anonymous comments are turned on here. Technically I *do* log IPs and I don't see a quick way to turn it off just for this post, but you have my word that I won't attempt to match up anybody anonymous here with any specific person. If you're really worried for some reason, there are many fine technical measures to make that tracking ineffective at finding you.

[identity profile] slinkr.livejournal.com 2010-06-02 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Using your relationship status or family status as a justification for salary decisions is sexist, discriminatory and illegal. Whether it's giving a woman a smaller raise when she has a baby, giving a man a larger raise when his wife has a baby, giving a woman a lower salary because her husband/boyfriend makes a lot of money and she "doesn't need to work", or anything else not related to your job performance, it's sexist.

[identity profile] kalmn.livejournal.com 2010-06-02 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
is there anything clearly written up on giving women who had babies that year smaller raises being illegal? (i'm in the us.) because i think i may need that about this time next year, if my boss is dumb enough to put that part in writing.

[identity profile] slinkr.livejournal.com 2010-06-02 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not a lawyer, but it might be worth talking to one if you're concerned. That sort of thing is often hard to prove, unless your boss is dumb enough to put it in writing.

[identity profile] judith-s.livejournal.com 2010-06-02 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 added discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions as unlawful sex discrimination into Title VII.